HomeAboutContact | ...loading...

RULE 60Y-4.001 FAC | APPLICABILITY

(1) The rules set forth in this chapter shall apply to all proceedings, except as provided in subsection (2), described in the rules of the Commission, unless specifically provided in the context of an individual rule.

(2) This chapter shall not apply to
Complaints (Rule 60Y-5.001, F.A.C.);

Agreements for Referral of Complaints (Rule 60Y-5.002, F.A.C.);

Investigation of Complaints (Rule 60Y-5.003, F.A.C.);

Conciliation (Rule 60Y-5.005, F.A.C.);

Administrative Dismissal (Rule 60Y-5.006, F.A.C.).
(3) When a proceeding pursuant to Chapter 60Y-5, F.A.C., of the rules of the Commission is before a Panel, the term “Commission,” when it appears in this chapter, shall include that Panel, if the context so requires.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on Rule 60Y-4.001 FAC!

You might need to reference it during your pursuit of justice.

For instance, you might need to understand certain regulations to recover from the damages that lawbreaking judges/lawyers/agencies have inflicted upon you [and/or the public] (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
logoAdobe Download
YouTubeVideo A Judge's Perjury
logoCases A Judge's Perjury
logoGraph Analysis: Pro Se & Race Status
logoHTML How-To Guides
logoHandbook Handbooks
logoHTML Info: Motion vs Pleading
logoHTML Lists: Attorneys
logoReports Reporter Series
logoRules Rules
logoSamples Sample Court Documents
logoSurvey Survey
logoTable Tables: Courthouses (US)
logoTemplates Templates
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One
FACs - Employment Discrimination FACs - General FACs - Housing Discrimination FACs - Pub. Accommodations FACs - Whistleblower
60Y-4 | General
Civil Rights Attorneys - FL
All-in-One
Reports: DOAH Regulation
Fla. R. App. P. Fla. R. Civ. P. Fla. R. Crim. P. Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin.
All Pertinent Laws (Florida) All Fla. R. Civ. P.
Buffa v Singletary, 652 So. 2d 885 (1DCA 1995) Gadsden v Lewis, 348 So. 2d 343 (1DCA 1977) Kearse v DHRS, 474 So. 2d 819 (1DCA 1985)
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike UniApp
1.0
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG