TBD | Section IV (Fordham Univeristy Law Review | Volume 53 Issue 6 Article 10)
Home About Contact |
Section IV | 53 FORDHAM 6.10
AdobeLogo Download

IV | CONCLUSION

The doctrine of judicial immunity is broad. It is a necessity for a strong and independent judiciary. Although the parameters of judicial immunity are extensive, they do have limits. The judicial act requirement of judicial immunity is a basic tenet of the doctrine. If there is no judicial act performed, absolute immunity does not apply. A private prior agreement to rule in favor of a party is not a judicial act under any definition of the term, and therefore should never be afforded judicial immunity protection. Although executive, administrative, legislative, or ministerial acts may be official functions of a judge, they are not judicial acts under a correct reading of the Stump definition. Thus, the doctrine of judicial immunity should not apply in these instances either.
(Fordham Law Review. Joseph Romagnoli)

Congratulations! You're now booked up on Section IV from Volume 53 Issue 6 Article 10 of Fordham University's Law Review on Judicial Immunity!

Please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG
Pages You Might Also Like