HomeAboutContact | ...loading...
Buy™.Sell™.Shop™.
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™Shop™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™.Sell™.Shop™.

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell! Help thousands of other litigants who [will] find themselves in your shoes!
Sell™ Now

SECTION XIII | CONCLUSIONS

The scope of judicial liability in Roman law covered a range of activity including intentional and unintentional judicial misbehavior. The extension of judicial liability from clearly intentional acts of wrongdoing to imprudent error created a broader base of judicial accountability. Two other changes in the law accompanied this chronological development. As the judge incurred greater liability for judicial misbehavior, the sanctions imposed upon the judge became less severe and more compensatory in nature. During the Republican Period, the scope of the iudex qui litem suam facit was very narrow, yet its sanction was very harsh. Hence, its legal purpose during that time was deterrence and retribution. During the Classical and post-Classical Periods, its scope broadened, while its sanction diminished. Roman law increasingly directed the sanction at compensation of the litigant in an effort to preserve the integrity of the legal system.

This phenomenon in Roman law parallels the development of the doctrine of judicial immunity in the American legal system, where the availability of an appeal system gave rise to the concept of judicial immunity. Currently, the status of judicial immunity is rather broad, thus providing little recourse to litigants for misconduct arising from a judge's official duties. However, similar to the philosophical and historical underpinnings of Roman society, American legal and political systems provide numerous other measures of accountability in an effort to balance the judiciary's need for independence with society's duty to redress the wronged litigant.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on Section XIII from Catholic University's 2000 Law Review article on Judicial Immunity!
You might need to reference it during your pursuit of justice.

For instance, you might need to examine this passage in order to protect yourself from judges/lawyers/organizations who break the law (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).

Nevertheless – and as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Buy™.Sell™.Shop™.
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™Shop™
logoAdobe Download
logoInfo FCHR 101: How it Works
iconMusic Audio: Drop the Steal
YouTubeVideo Video: A Judge's Perjury
logoCases A Judge's Perjury
logoHTML How-To: Disqualification
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Bribery
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Corruption
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Discrimination
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Obstructions
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One Judicial Immunity: 49 CATHU 4
14th Amendment (US)
42 USC §1983
How-To: File a Federal Lawsuit
Info: How 42 USC §1983 is Adjudicated Info: How Judicial Immunity Works
Reading List: Judicial Immunity
Makere v Early (4:21-cv-00096; USFLND)
Shop | TBD Marketplace™
Buy | TBD Marketplace™
Sell | TBD Marketplace™
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG