TBD | Rule 14 (JCJD)
Home About Contact |
Rule 14 (JCJD)
Rule 14 (JudCon-US) Download

RULE 14 | CONDUCT OF SPECIAL-COMMITTEE HEARINGS

(a) Purpose of Hearings. The special committee may hold hearings to take testimony and receive other evidence, to hear argument, or both. If the special committee is investigating allegations against more than one judge, it may hold joint or separate hearings.
(b) Special-Committee Evidence. Subject to Rule 15, the special committee must obtain material, nonredundant evidence in the form it considers appropriate. In the special committee’s discretion, evidence may be obtained by committee members, staff, or both. Witnesses offering testimonial evidence may include the complainant and the subject judge.
(c) Counsel for Witnesses. The subject judge has the right to counsel. The special committee has discretion to decide whether other witnesses may have counsel present when they testify.
(d) Witness Fees. Witness fees must be paid as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1821.
(e) Oath. All testimony taken at a hearing must be given under oath or affirmation.
(f) Rules of Evidence. The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to special-committee hearings.
(g) Record and Transcript. A record and transcript must be made of all hearings.

Commentary

This Rule is adapted from the Act, 28 U.S.C. §353, and the Illustrative Rules.
Rule 14 is concerned with the conduct of fact-finding hearings. Special-committee hearings will normally be held only after the investigative work has been completed and the committee has concluded that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a formal fact-finding proceeding. Special-committee proceedings are primarily inquisitorial rather than adversarial. Accordingly, the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply to such hearings. Inevitably, a hearing will have something of an adversary character. Nevertheless, that tendency should be moderated to the extent possible. Even though a proceeding will commonly have investigative and hearing stages, special-committee members should not regard themselves as prosecutors one day and judges the next. Their duty — and that of their staff — is at all times to be impartial seekers of the truth.
Rule 14(b) contemplates that material evidence will be obtained by the special committee and presented in the form of affidavits, live testimony, etc. Staff or others who are organizing the hearings should regard it as their role to present evidence representing the entire picture. With respect to testimonial evidence, the subject judge should normally be called as a special-committee witness. Cases may arise in which the subject judge will not testify voluntarily. In such cases, subpoena powers are available, subject to the normal testimonial privileges. Although Rule 15(c) recognizes the subject judge’s statutory right to call witnesses on his or her own behalf, exercise of this right should not usually be necessary.

Congratulations! You're now booked up on Rule 14 from the US Rules of Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings!

Please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Send Email

Pages You Might Also Like