|Background:||You propounded discovery|
|Problem:||A party has moved the Court to halt your discovery|
|Solution:||You ask the Court to deny that party's motion to quash|
Rule 26(b)(1) Fed. R. Civ. P. | Discovery Scope and Limits
"Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case" Rule 45(d)(3) Fed. R. Civ. P. | Subpoena Enforcement
"(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on motion, quash...”" Rule 1.410(c) Fla. R. Civ. P. | Subpoena
"but the court, on motion made promptly and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance therewith, may (1) quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable and oppressive... On motion to compel discovery or to quash, the person from whom discovery is sought must show that the information sought or the form requested is not reasonably accessible because of undue costs or burden ...the court may nonetheless order discovery... considering the limitations set out in rule 1.280(d)(2)" §120.569(2)(k) Florida Statutes | Decisions Which Affect Substantial Interest
"1. Any person subject to a subpoena may, before compliance and on timely petition, request the presiding officer having jurisdiction of the dispute to invalidate the subpoena on the ground that it was not lawfully issued, is unreasonably broad in scope, or requires the production of irrelevant material."
|1||TBD case. Pro Se Filing. USFLMD. Non-Party. Defendant Employee. Lack Standing/Merit. Bifurcated|
|2||- Withdrawn. 2007. Attorney Filing. USNYWD. Confidentiality Stipulation.|
|3||Partially Granted. 2007. Attorney Filing. USNYWD. Boilerplate Objections ("embarass", "burden", etc.)|
|4||✓✓ Quash Denied! 2007. Attorney Filing. USNYWD. DNA. Confession.|
|5||¿ Unknown Result ? 2006. Attorney Filing. DOAH. Invalid Reasons. Civil Rights Case.|
|6||✓✓ Quash Denied! 2006. Attorney Filing. DOAH. Boilerplate objections. Civil Rights Case.|
|7||¿ Unknown Result ? 2011. DOAH. Deposition.|
|8||X Quash Granted. 2011. Attorney Filing. DOAH. Deposition of Agency's In-House Counsel.|
|9||✓✓ Quash Denied! 2018. TBD case. Pro Se Filing. "Apex Doctrine"|
|1||DOAH | Replace all placeholder tags with real information (eg "[plfName]" becomes "John Doe").|
|2||USFLMD | Replace all placeholder tags with real information (eg "[plfName]" becomes "John Doe").|
Motions to Quash are common to civil rights litigation. They can hinder your chances to prevail at trial (and/or negotiate a proper settlement).
Plus, the decision to quash/permit is almost entirely up to the Judge.
Therefore, learn how to overcome this obstacle.
Hopefully, the samples and templates listed on this page can guide you along.