Home About Contact |
Icon-UpArrow Written Objections (Federal)

How-To: Draft Your Written Objections (Federal)

Background: The Court made an important ruling in your case
Problem: The Court's ruling was based on error/mistake/oversight/etc.
Solution: You write & submit a formal objection

I. Legal Citations

28 USC §636(b)(1)(C) | Pro Se Civil-Rights Cases and Collateral Attacks on Criminal Convictions
"Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Rule 46 Fed. R. Civ. P. | Objecting to a Ruling or Order
"When the ruling or order is requested or made, a party need only state the action that it wants the court to take or objects to, along with the grounds for the request or objection." Rule 60 Fed. R. Civ. P. | Relief from a Judgment or Order
“(a) CORRECTIONS BASED ON CLERICAL MISTAKES; OVERSIGHTS AND OMISSIONS. The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice.” Rule 72 Fed. R. Civ. P. | Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order
“(2) Objections. Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Rule 3-1 11th Cir. R. | Failure to Object to a Magistrate Judge’s Findings or Recommendations.
"A party failing to object to a magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions if the party was informed of the time period for objecting and the consequences on appeal for failing to object. In the absence of a proper objection, however, the court may review on appeal for plain error if necessary in the interests of justice."

II. Samples

# PDF Comments
1logoAdobeTBD case. USFLMD. Pro Se Filing. 2020. §1981 Case (+ §760 FS). Clear Error + Contrary to LawiconPriceTag
2logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Criminal Case. Response. Standard of Review + Governing Law.iconPriceTag
3logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Criminal Case. Clear Error + Contrary to Law.iconPriceTag
4logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Forum Selection. "Alter Ego" Doctrine.iconPriceTag
5logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Ipso Facto Third-Party. Standard of Review. 28 USC §1441.iconPriceTag
6logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Standard of Review + Governing Law. Rule 56. Summary Judgment.iconPriceTag
7logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Letter Format. 3 Pages.iconPriceTag
8logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Criminal Case. Evidence Suppression.iconPriceTag
9logoAdobeUSNYWD. 2007. Attorney Filing. Criminal Case. Evidence Suppression. Government Filing.iconPriceTag

III. Templates

# Word Comments
1Replace all of the placeholder tags with real information (eg "[plfName]" becomes "John Doe").iconPriceTag

IV. Quick Commentary

V. Additional Notes

VII. Bibliography

VIII. Conclusion

With the use of the template (as well as the samples above), you can more easily draft your Written Objections (Federal).


Congratulations! You're now booked up on how to write your Objections in federal court.

Please get the justice you deserve.


add a comment
Your comment about judges enjoying absolute immunity is documented and proven as false. Old constitutional law, our current state and federal laws, the rules of judicial conduct but MOST-OF-ALL the judges own Department Of Justice (DOJ) Laws, Rules, Regulations and Procedures clearly state

- 11/2/23 | Anonymous User 047-***-***-138

Thank you for your informational comment. You’ve suppled the type of user interaction that TBD believes will add more value/resources to other site visitors. So, please enjoy the points you’ve received; and read further to see how you’ve made a difference...

Okay, to address your comment: The comment from above is not false. Instead, it is true (unfortunately). TBD derived it from multiple appellate decisions from the judiciary itself. You can find such material in:

(1) this Reading List on Judicial Immunity; and/or

(2) this breakdown of How Judicial Immunity Works.

The government decisions contained therein show that, unfortunately, our judiciary has hidden itself behind this so-called wall of "absolute judicial immunity". In some instances, they’ve used their self-made doctrine in order to cover up their non-judicial acts (eg, xeroxing papers – to hide crucial transcript pages).

So, in addressing your comment TBD has added more content to this page. Reason: TBD agrees with you that more information is needed on that blurb about absolute immunity. However, TBD has kept the original statement unchanged (reason: the statement is true; until/unless the government abolishes our judges' self-made absolute judicial immunity). Footnote: Your comment seemed to cutoff at 290 characters (which seems like a mistake because comments permit 1,024 characters). So, if there’s more information that you wanted to supply then please add another comment. - 11/3/23 | TextBookDiscrimination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------- TBD ----------------------------------------------------------------
IconQuiz IconLike
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG
Pages You Might Also Like