How-To: Write a Motion for Default Judgment
| Background: | You sued someone for affirmative relief |
| Problem: | That person has failed to respond to your complaint |
| Solution: | You ask the Court to enter judgment in your favor |
I. Definitions
"2. judgment given without the defendant being heard in his own defense."
II. Legal Citations
III. Samples
| # | Comments | ₧ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ± TBD case. Pro Se Filing | Duval | §1983 Case | Failure to Appear (AG tried to rescue, though) | ||
| 2 | x Denied | 2020 | Attorney Filing | Defendant Moved to Strike (denied); Failed to answer complaint | ||
| 3 | ✓ Granted | 2020 | Attorney Filing | Unlawful Detainer; Quitclaim Deed | ||
| 4 | ✓ Granted | 2020 | Attorney Filing | Attached Proposed Order | ||
| 5 | ✓ Granted | 2020 | Attorney Filing | Car Crash; Requested hearing on damages | ||
| 6 | ✓ Granted | 2020 | Attorney Filing | Failure to appear | ||
| 7 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Unlawful Detainer | ||
| 8 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Writ of Possession | ||
| 9 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Eviction Case; Failure to Appear; | ||
| 10 | ± Pending | 2019 | Pro Se Filing | Non-Lawyer Representative; | ||
| 11 | x Denied | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Declaratory Action; Failure to appear | ||
| 12 | - No ruling | 2019 | Pro Se Filing | Standard Form; Failure to appear; Calculated Damages (133k) | ||
| 13 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Fraud case; Motor vehicle; Long-winded; Failure to appear | ||
| 14 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Failure to appear | ||
| 15 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Commercial Eviction; incomplete/not proofread | ||
| 16 | - no ruling | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Defendant asked for an extension, but still failed to respond | ||
| 17 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Nice Document; Calculated Damages | ||
| 18 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Dual Request (Default and Default Judgment); Attached Proposed Order(s) | ||
| 19 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Included Summary Judgment; Nice Document; Liquidated vs Unliquidated Damages | ||
| 20 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Mentioned Default Entry | ||
| 21 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Pro Se Filing | Prisoner; Willful disregard; Discovery; Many citations; Showed Damages; | ||
| 22 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Pro Se Filing | Court-Issued Form | ||
| 23 | ✓ Granted | 2019 | Proposed Order only (titled "Final Judgment") | ||
| 24 | ✓ Granted | 2018 | Attorney Filing | Property case; Cited Freeman v Freeman | ||
| 25 | ✓ Granted | 2018 | Attorney Filing | Declaration Violation; Injunction; Defendant died beforehand | ||
| 26 | - no ruling | 2019 | Attorney Filing | Dual Request (Default and Default Judgment) | ||
| 27 | ✓ Granted | 2018 | Attorney Filing | Failure to Appear; Affidavits; Requested hearing on damages | ||
| 28 | ✓ Granted | 2018 | Attorney Filing | Writ of Possession; Many Affidavits (Venue, etc.); Failure to Appear | ||
| 29 | ✓ Granted | 2017 | Attorney Filing | Declaratory Judgment; §86.011 FS; Loan | ||
| 30 | - no ruling | 2017 | Pro Se Filing | Cited entry of default; $119k in calculated damages; | ||
| 31 | ✓ Granted | 2017 | Attorney Filing | Declaratory Judgment; §86.011 FS; Loan | ||
| 32 | x Denied | 2017 | Attorney Filing | Discovery Problems; Judicial Notice; Sanctions; | ||
| 33 | ✓ Granted | 2016 | Attorney Filing | Foreclosure Case; Demand for Payment | ||
| 34 | x Denied | 2014 | Pro Se Filing | Qui Tam Case; Corporation; Constitution Cited | ||
| 35 | ✓ Granted | 2014 | Attorney Filing | Writ of Garnishment | ||
| 36 | - no ruling | 2012 | Attorney Filing | Clerk vacated Default; No responsive pleading | ||
| 37 | ✓ Granted | 2012 | Attorney Filing | Mortgage Case; Many Citations | ||
| 38 | ✓ Partially Granted | 2011 | Attorney Filing | Eviction Case; Many Citations; Summary Judgment Stated | ||
| 39 | ✓ Partially Granted | 2010 | Attorney Filing | Eviction Case; No Exceptions; Attached Default | ||
| 40 | - no ruling | 2010 | Attorney Filing | Discrimination Case; Motion to Sever; Withdraw Counsel |
IV. Templates
| # | Link | Comments | ₧ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duval Version | Replace all placeholder tags (eg "[plfName]" becomes "John Doe"). |
V. Quick Commentary
- Important Note: Notify your civil opponent of the Default proceedings if he/she contacted you prior to entry of default. If you don't then an appellate court might overrule the Default Judgment.
"A paper served prior to the entry of default triggers the requirement that the party against whom a default is sought be served with notice of the application. In the case under consideration, the letter confirming the bank's agreement to an extension of time constituted a paper served within the meaning of rule 1.500(b). Zettler v. Ehrlich, 384 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (Schwartz, J., specially concurring). See also, Roland v. W.L. Motor Lines, Inc., 32 N.C. App. 288, 231 S.E.2d 685 (1977). Any paper served prior to the entry of a default requires the furnishing of notice."
- Important Note: Federal Magistrates can only recommend default judgment (ie, they cannot enter it themselves)
"Article III of the United States Constitution does not allow a magistrate judge to order the entry of a final judgment. See United States v. Flaherty, 668 F.2d 566, 585 (1st Cir.1981); Horton v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 590 F.2d 403, 404 (1st Cir.1979). A district court judge may assign a case to a magistrate judge to hear evidence regarding the amount of a default judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3); however, issuing an order to enter judgment is an entirely different matter. The district judge must review the magistrate judge's recommendations, and only the district judge can order the entry of the final judgment."
- Purpose: To recover damages for the plaintiff due to the defendant's forfeited admission's of all material fact
"The true purpose of the entry of a default is to speed the cause thereby preventing a dilatory or procrastinating defendant from impeding the plaintiff in the establishment of his claim. It is not procedure intended to furnish an advantage to the plaintiff so that a defense may be defeated or a judgment reached without the difficulty that arises from a contest by the defendant.""
- Hearing on Damages: If the relief you claimed for is not exact then request a trial/hearing on all uncalculated damages
“A default admits every cause of action that is sufficiently well-pled to properly invoke the jurisdiction of the court and to give due process notice to the party against whom relief is sought. A default also admits the plaintiff's entitlement to liquidated damages due under the pleaded cause of action, but not unliquidated damages."
"Damages are liquidated when the proper amount to be awarded can be determined with exactness from the cause of action as pleaded, i.e., from a pleaded agreement between the parties, by an arithmetical calculation or by application of definite rules of law. Since every negotiable instrument must be "an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money" ( see, e.g., §§ 673.104(1)(b) and 673.106, Fla. Stat. (1981)), actions for the sums directly due on negotiable instruments are, by definition, actions for liquidated damages."
"However, damages are not liquidated if the ascertainment of their exact sum requires the taking of testimony to ascertain facts upon which to base a value judgment... A defaulting party has a due process entitlement to notice and opportunity to be heard as to the presentation and evaluation of evidence necessary to a judicial determination of the amount of unliquidated damages." - Download as many sample documents as you'd like
- Contact TBD for more free samples
- Feel free to use the templates (see Part IV - above) to help draft your 'Motion for Leave to Reply'
- Save the final version as a PDF file.
- File the final version in court
VI. Additional Notes
- Military Service Lookup
- You might want to include a certification that your defendant was not in the military
- (therefore, he/she cannot be excused from default final judgment)
- You might want to include a certification that your defendant was not in the military
- Read this appellate decision that outlines the process of securing default and default judgment
VII. Bibliography
- Coggin v Barfield, 8 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1942)
- Conetta v. National, 186 FRD 262 (DRI 1999)
- Bowman v Kingsland, 432 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Murphy v Stacy, 19-13553 (11th Circuit 2020)
- Reicheinbach v Southeast, 462 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Roland v. W.L. Motor Lines, Inc., 32 N.C. App. 288, 231 S.E.2d 685 (1977)
- Zettler v. Ehrlich, 384 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
VIII. Conclusion
...POINTS & THINGS...
Please get the justice you deserve.
Sincerely,
www.TextBookDiscrimination.com

