HomeAboutContact |
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help other litigants.
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

CROSS EXAMINATION

the questioning of a witness, by a party or lawyer other than the one who called the witness, concerning matters bout which the witness has testified during DIRECT EXAMINATION. The purpose is to discredit or clarify testimony already given so as to neutralize damaging testimony or present facts in a light more favorable to the party against whom the direct testimony was offered.
DIRECT EXAMINATION: the initial questioning of a witness by the party who called the witness. The purpose is to present testimony containing the factual argument the party is making.

REDIRECT EXAMINATION: the questioning of a witness by a party who called the witness, which occurs after that witness has been subjected to cross-examination. The purpose of redirect examination is to rebut or to clarify any damaging testimony elicited on cross-examination.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on what Cross Examination means!

You'll probably need to reference a legal glossary during your pursuit of justice.

For instance, you may need the technical definition of a word in order to protect yourself from organizations/judges/lawyers who break the law (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).

Nevertheless – and as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help other litigants.
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Shop | TBD Marketplace™
Buy | TBD Marketplace™
Sell | TBD Marketplace™
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One
Childers v Floyd, 642 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 2011) Daniels v State, 34 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) Gelabert v State, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) Lavette v State, 442 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) Mouery v State, 884 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) US v Abel, 469 US 45 (1984) Wallace v State, 26 So. 713 (Fla. 1899)
logoInfo FCHR 101: How it Works
logoHTML UniApp 1.0™
logoLists Lists: Attorneys
logoLists Lists: Reading
logoSurvey Survey
logoGraph Analysis: FCHR Voting
iconMusic Audio: Drop the Steal
YouTubeVideo Video: A Judge's Perjury
logoHTML How-To Guides
logoHandbook Handbooks
logoHTML Sample Court Documents
logoTemplates Templates
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Bribery
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Corruption
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Discrimination
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Obstructions
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help other litigants.
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG