As of January 24, 2024, the names of [two of] the defendants have been redacted (eg, "Redacted Company A", "Redacted Company B"). These redaction may-or-may-not change at a later date.
Nevertheless, reading through these communications should still reveal to you how the FCHR obstructs discrimination cases. Doing so, notably, by:
(a) making false statements;
➢ see Communications 07, 15, 27, and 29
(b) failing to answer direct questions;
➢ see Communications 35, 57, 63
(c) refusing to talk to the complainant directly (via phone);
➢ see Communications 35, 63
(d) transferring the complainant's case without notifying the complainant;
➢ see Communications 08, 10, 11, 35 (importantly), and 56
(e) failing to notify the complainant of the charge's dual-filed nature
• (in contravention of §2E Workshare Agreement)
➢ see Communications 22, 34, 58, 60, and 64
(f) pretending that the complainant's COD never existed; and
➢ see Communication 07
(g) attempting to manufacture an issue of timeliness.
➢ see Communications 38, 57
Thus, please stay vigilant... and stay tuned.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on Communication ZZ from the series of communications which reveal the way the FCHR obstructs cases of discrimination (by manufacturing issues of timeliness)!