| Date: | Tuesday, September 5, 2023 |
| Time: | 10:01 EST |
| From: | Justice.Actuarial@gmail.com |
| To: | MiamiAtty@EEOC.gov |
| cc: | Florencio.Ocampgo@EEOC.Gov; Kartiesha.Collymore@EEOC.gov; Kendrica.Howard@FCHR.MyFlorida.com; Victor.Hernandez-Mejia@FCHR.MyFlorida.com |
| Subject: | Status Update (?) | Makere v Redacted Company A, et al | Employment Discrimination |
| Attachments: | EEOC Discrimination Charge (New) | Employment | Makere v Redacted Company A, et al; FW: EEOC Discrimination Charge (New) | Employment | Makere v Redacted Company A, et al |
Good Morning EEOC,
May I please have an update on my Charge of Employment Discrimination (details below)?
| Complainant/Petitioner: | Elias Makere, FSA, MAAA |
| Defendant/Respondent #1: | Redacted Company A |
| Defendant/Respondent #2: | Redacted Company B |
| Defendant/Respondent #3: | Florida Commission on Human Relations, The |
| State(s) Involved: | Florida Oregon Washington |
| Statutes: | EPA (29 USC §206, et seq) Title VII (42 USC §2000e, et seq) FCRA (§760 Florida Statutes) 42 USC §1981 42 USC §1983 (‘Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871’) 42 USC §1985 |
| Date of Last Event: | 10/13/2022 |
| Today’s Date: | 7/31/2023 |
| Days Passed: | 291 (within state-elevated 300-day window) |
| Continuing Action: | Yes |
| Bases: | Color, Race, Sex Retaliation |
| Adverse Event(s): | Refusal-to-Hire Fake Interview Dissuade Ongoing Litigation Retaliation |
| Document: | (attached) TextBookDiscrimination.com/Files/Misc/0a_Complaint_Employment.pdf |
Pertinent History:
2. 291 days later – on July 31, 2023 – I filed my employment complaint of discrimination (see first attachment).
ii. with the FCHR (a FEPA)).
Importance:
5. Monday, August 28, 2023 marked the deadline for any such answer(s) (Rule 6 Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 2.514 Fla. R. Jud. Admin.).
6. As of today’s date (9/5/23), no such answers have been delivered to me (ie, the plaintiff).
Additional Note:
8. The FCHR is a co-defendant due to:
b. Its penchant for obstructing justice (ie, intentionally mailing determination letters to the wrong people; determinations which were null & void);
c. Its history of ratifying government-borne perjury;
d. Its adherence to self-discrimination;
e. Its committed purpose of saving defendants “millions” of dollars (when faced with discrimination suits);
f. Its support of the other defendants by subverting the US Constitution – while acting under the “color of law” (Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871); and
g. more
Thank you,
Elias Makere, FSA, MAAA | Founder, Civil Litigant
Federal Case No.: 3:20-cv-00905 | (Allstate, USFLMD)
Federal Case No.: 4:21-cv-00096 | (Early, USFLND)
11th Cir. Case No.: 21-11901
904.294.0026 | TextBook.Discrimination@outlook.com | www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
3709 San Pablo Rd. S. #701
Jacksonville, FL 32224 Ancient Proverb: For every wrong there is a right. TextBookDiscrimination.com® | © 2024. All Rights Reserved.
