prev item | table of contents | next item |
type | bankruptcy | dismissed | implicitly settled | lost | released | relinquished | settled | unknown | victory | withdrawn | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eee | 13 | 392 | 278 | 1,538 | 16 | 26 | 949 | 1 | 112 | 390 | 3,715 |
hou | 78 | 36 | 266 | 1 | 9 | 122 | 19 | 102 | 633 | ||
oth | 26 | 21 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 74 | ||||
pub | 1 | 34 | 13 | 50 | 1 | 75 | 18 | 34 | 226 |
type | bankruptcy | dismissed | implicitly settled | lost | released | relinquished | settled | unknown | victory | withdrawn | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eee | 0% | 11% | 7% | 41% | 0% | 1% | 26% | 0% | 3% | 10% | 100% |
hou | 0% | 12% | 6% | 42% | 0% | 1% | 19% | 0% | 3% | 16% | 100% |
oth | 0% | 35% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 8% | 12% | 0% | 14% | 3% | 100% |
pub | 0% | 15% | 6% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 8% | 15% | 100% |
This is the lowest rate across the different case types.
Plus, it's much lower than the average (40%).
This is the highest rate across the different case types.
Plus, it's significantly higher than the global average (3%).
• they're victorious much more often (8% vs 3%);
• they settle more frequently (33% vs 24%); and
• they're far less likely to suffer losses (22% vs 41%);
The differences in percentage points are very noticeable (as seen by the shapes of the graphs).
TBD contends that the differences are largely due to the differences in ramifications across the case types (ie, damages for public accommodations discrimination are significantly lower than other discrimination case types).