Home About Contact |
Icon-UpArrow ...Outcomes → FL → FCHR ► By Representation

Analysis of FCHR Case Outcomes
With Representation vs Without Representation

Totals
field bankruptcy dismissed implicitly settled lost released relinquished settled unknown victory withdrawn Total
all145303271,87517421,15511595284,648
with1711562835195600291391,263
without134591711,592122359511303893,385
Percents
field bankruptcy dismissed implicitly settled lost released relinquished settled unknown victory withdrawn Total
all0%11%7%40%0%1%25%0%3%*11%100%
with0%6%12%22%0%2%44%0%2%*11%100%
without0%14%5%47%0%1%18%0%4%*11%100%

Fact #1: 2% of represented cases end in a victory.

• This is meaningfully lower than the rate for unrepresented cases (ie, pro se cases) (4%).
• Plus, this is marginally lower than the global average (2%).

Fact #2: 22% of represented cases end in a loss.

• This is significantly lower than the rate for unrepresented cases (ie, pro se cases) (47%).
• Plus, this is much lower than the global average (40%).

Fact #3: 44% of represented cases end in a settlement.

• This is tremendously higher than the rate for unrepresented cases (ie, pro se cases) (18%).
• Plus, this is significantly higher than the global average (25%).

Takeaway #1: Obtaining legal representation will:

• Primarily, increase your chance of settlement;
• Secondarily, decrease your chance of a loss; and
• Tertiarily, decrease your chance of victory.

• In other words, attorneys will trade your wins-&-losses for ties.
FCHR/DOAH cases, however, rarely disclose the settlement terms. Therefore, it’s hard to say whether those 'ties' are truly ties; or whether they are coerced withdrawals.

Additional: These numbers can be further analyzed by:

(a) case type;
(b) charge (eg, age, col, etc.);
(c) determination impact; (ie, 'cause' vs 'no cause')
(d) retaliation impact (ie, 'with' vs 'without' [retaliation]); and
(e) year;
(f) the plaintiff's demographics (eg, age, dis, etc.).

...POINTS & THINGS...

Congratulations! You're now booked up on how FCHR Case Outcomes are distributed across different kinds of investigative determinations (ie, 'cause' vs 'no cause', etc.)!

Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.

Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Pages That You
Might Also Like
Summary Raw Data
How-To: Appeal a Final Order How-To: Write Exceptions to a Final Order
Info: FCHR Bribery Info: FCHR Discrimination Info: Suing for Constitutional Deprivations
Guide: File Suit (Federal) Guide: File Suit (State)
Handbook: File Suit (EEOC) Handbook: PFR (FCHR/DOAH)
Flow Chart: FCHR Investigation
TBD.F: Final Orders TBD.R: Recommended Orders TBD.C: Actual Charges
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike IconLike
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG