Home About Contact |
Icon-UpArrow Analysis → Outcomes → FL → FCHR ► By Religion

Analysis of FCHR Case Outcomes | By Demographics
Plaintiff's Religion

Totals
group bankruptcy dismissed implicitly settled lost released relinquished settled unknown victory withdrawn Total
all145303271,87517421,15511595284,648
christian01812700402153
non-christian04122011003546
Percents
group bankruptcy dismissed implicitly settled lost released relinquished settled unknown victory withdrawn Total
% all0%11%7%40%0%1%25%0%3%*11%100%
% christian0%34%2%51%0%0%8%0%4%2%100%
% non-christian0%9%2%48%0%2%22%0%7%11%100%

Fact #1: For cases involving a Christian plaintiff, 4% have resulted in a victory.

• This is meaningfully lower than the rate for non-Christian litigants (7%).
• However, it’s marginally higher than the global average (3%) (see "Note #1" [below]).

Fact #2: For cases involving a Christian plaintiff, 51% have resulted in a loss.

• This is higher than the rate for non-Christian litigants (48%).
• Plus, it’s much higher than the global average (40%) (see "Note #1" [below]).

Fact #3: For cases involving a Christian plaintiff, 8% have resulted in an explicit settlement.

• This is lower than the rate for non-Christian litigants (17%).
• Plus, it’s tremendously lower than the global average (25%) (see "Note #1" [below]).

Takeaway #1: Religion has a significant impact on the outcome of a case.

• Christian plaintiffs face worse legal outcomes than their non-Christian counterparts (worse probabilities: for victories, losses, settlements, and so on).

Note #1: the demographic characteristics for many litigants is unknown. Which is why the “all” row doesn’t quite measure up to the sum of the individual pieces (see tables [above]).

Note #2: The population size for this data is too small for these statistics to be reliable.

Additional: These numbers can be further analyzed by:

(a) case type;
(b) charge (eg, age, col, etc.);
(c) determination impact; (ie, 'cause' vs 'no cause')
(d) legal representation; (ie, 'with attorney' vs 'without attorney')
(e) retaliation impact (ie, 'with' vs 'without' [retaliation]); and
(f) year;

...POINTS & THINGS...

Congratulations! You're now booked up on how FCHR Case Outcomes vary based on the plaintiff's religion!

Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.

Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Shop | TBD Marketplace™
Buy | TBD Marketplace™
Sell | TBD Marketplace™
Pages That You
Might Also Like
Summary Raw Data
How-To: Appeal a Final Order How-To: Write Exceptions to a Final Order
Info: FCHR Bribery Info: FCHR Discrimination Info: Suing for Constitutional Deprivations
Guide: File Suit (Federal) Guide: File Suit (State)
Handbook: File Suit (EEOC) Handbook: PFR (FCHR/DOAH)
Flow Chart: FCHR Investigation
TBD.F: Final Orders TBD.R: Recommended Orders TBD.C: Actual Charges
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike IconLike
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG