Home About Contact |
UpButton Analysis → Determinations → FL → FCHR ► Race

ANALYSIS OF HOW FCHR DETERMINATIONS VARY BY THE RACE OF THE COMPLAINANT

fieldBlackNon-Blacktotal
cause12518143
noCause8381771015
pC13%9%12%
pNC87%91%88%
pRef83%17%100%

Fact #1: Historically, the FCHR has had a slight negative bias against complainant’s who are not black.

Evidenced by the disparity of its 13% rate and its 9% rate [for 'cause' determinations] between the two groups.

Takeaway #1: Despite its racial preferences, the FCHR still maintains a practice of rendering no cause determinations at a high rate.

Note #2: these records come from a subset of all complaints.
Reason: complainant's don't always indicate their race when filing FCHR complaints (see disclaimer).

...POINTS & THINGS...

Congratulations! You're now booked up on how often the FCHR enters 'cause'/'no-cause' determinations for people in these two distinct groups!

Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.

Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Pages That You
Might Also Like
Summary Raw Data
How-To: Appeal a Final Order How-To: Write Exceptions to a Final Order
Info: FCHR Bribery Info: FCHR Discrimination Info: Suing for Constitutional Deprivations
Guide: File Suit (Federal) Guide: File Suit (State)
Handbook: File Suit (EEOC) Handbook: PFR (FCHR/DOAH)
Flow Chart: FCHR Investigation
TBD.D: Actual Determinations
Analysis: Race Distribution
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike IconLike
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG