Home About Contact |
UpButton Analysis → Determinations → FL → FCHR ► Family

ANALYSIS OF HOW FCHR DETERMINATIONS VARY BY THE FAMILY STATUS OF THE COMPLAINANT

fieldHas KidsNo Kidstotal
cause21021
noCause90090
pC19%0%19%
pNC81%100%81%
pRef100%0%100%

Fact #1: The FCHR has entered 'cause' determinations in 19% of cases in which the complainant indicated that he/she had children.

Fact #2: This dataset does not have any records in which the complainant indicated that he/she had zero kids.

Takeaway #1: The FCHR has a strong preference for complainant's who indicate that they have children.

Evidenced by the fact that it renders 'reasonable cause' determinations 19% of the time for people w/children. Yet only renders 12% for the population at-large.

Note #2: these records come from a subset of all complaints.
Reason: complainant's don't always indicate whether-or-not they have children (see disclaimer).

...POINTS & THINGS...

Congratulations! You're now booked up on how often the FCHR enters 'cause'/'no-cause' determinations for people in these two distinct groups!

Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.

Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Pages That You
Might Also Like
Summary Raw Data
How-To: Appeal a Final Order How-To: Write Exceptions to a Final Order
Info: FCHR Bribery Info: FCHR Discrimination Info: Suing for Constitutional Deprivations
Guide: File Suit (Federal) Guide: File Suit (State)
Handbook: File Suit (EEOC) Handbook: PFR (FCHR/DOAH)
Flow Chart: FCHR Investigation
TBD.D: Actual Determinations
Analysis: Family Status Distribution
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike IconLike
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG