Home About Contact |
Icon-UpArrow Analysis → Charges → FL → FCHR ► By Year

Analysis of FCHR Charges of Discrimination | By Year

(as of 8/31/2023)
Analysis Table | FCHR Charges | Longitidunal | 1979-present | Totals
yearagecoldisfammarnatorracereligretalsexunkTotal
1979155
1980321151817
19811224
198221226
19832242513
198476113113230
1985561121225
1986341724119
1987319231736133
19887533723631
19898124111411141
19905922175836
199181323224849
19923284422478169
199382111137417174
19944133759240
1995442541038329
199659511128128
19972812725122
1998671111356228
19991517124132715129
200031840341256329462153
200141163815877742421158
200231956443290345391228
200384852431774840491235
200431669342890116160228
200550779452398661561235
20063433831151442365136
20073364722146444538163
20084613695531106768701248
2009401083342773662471226
201032564322375946551210
201138547241350443452155
2012361047232457755302154
20134893821144533226129
201436554211465245323171
201524104123942232251112
20162813511125611341382147
20172284231651458543159
20182863723174984525127
2019287353164284130101
2020321772332765360433164
2021361261611958665474137
2022251147522353155641136
20233626461530582259551128
Analysis Table | FCHR Charges | Longitidunal | 1979-present | Percents
yearagecoldisfammarnatorracereligretalsexunkTotal
19790%20%0%0%0%0%100%0%0%0%0%100%
198018%0%12%0%6%6%29%0%6%47%0%100%
19810%0%0%0%0%25%50%0%0%50%0%100%
19820%0%33%0%17%0%33%0%0%33%0%100%
19830%0%15%0%15%0%31%0%15%38%0%100%
198423%0%20%0%3%0%43%3%3%10%7%100%
198520%0%24%0%0%4%48%0%4%8%0%100%
198616%0%21%0%5%0%37%0%11%21%5%100%
19879%3%27%0%6%9%52%0%9%18%3%100%
198823%0%16%0%10%10%23%6%10%19%0%100%
198920%0%29%0%0%10%27%2%10%27%2%100%
199014%0%25%0%6%6%47%0%14%22%0%100%
199116%0%27%0%4%6%45%0%8%16%0%100%
19924%0%41%0%6%6%32%6%10%12%1%100%
199311%0%28%0%1%15%50%0%5%23%1%100%
199410%0%33%0%0%8%18%0%13%23%5%100%
199514%0%14%7%17%14%34%0%10%28%10%100%
199618%0%32%0%0%18%39%4%7%29%4%100%
19979%0%36%5%0%9%32%0%9%23%5%100%
199821%0%25%4%4%4%46%0%18%21%7%100%
199952%3%24%3%7%14%45%7%24%52%3%100%
200020%5%26%2%3%8%37%2%19%30%1%100%
200126%10%24%1%3%5%49%4%27%27%1%100%
200214%4%25%2%2%14%39%1%20%17%0%100%
200336%3%22%2%1%7%31%3%17%21%0%100%
200414%3%30%1%2%12%39%5%27%26%0%100%
200521%3%34%2%2%10%42%3%26%24%0%100%
200625%2%28%0%2%8%38%3%31%26%4%100%
200720%4%29%1%1%9%39%2%28%23%0%100%
200819%5%28%2%2%13%43%3%27%28%0%100%
200918%4%37%1%2%12%32%3%27%21%0%100%
201015%2%30%1%1%11%36%4%22%26%0%100%
201125%3%30%1%3%8%32%3%28%29%1%100%
201223%6%31%1%2%16%37%5%36%19%1%100%
201337%7%29%2%1%11%35%2%25%20%0%100%
201421%3%32%1%1%8%38%1%26%19%2%100%
201521%9%37%2%3%8%38%2%29%22%1%100%
201619%9%35%1%1%17%41%9%28%26%1%100%
201714%5%26%0%2%10%32%3%36%34%2%100%
201822%5%29%2%2%13%39%6%35%20%0%100%
201928%7%35%0%3%16%42%8%41%30%0%100%
202020%10%44%2%2%16%40%2%37%26%2%100%
202126%9%45%4%1%14%42%4%47%34%3%100%
202218%8%35%4%1%17%39%11%41%30%0%100%
202328%20%36%0%12%23%45%17%46%43%1%100%
Fact #1: Across the board, discrimination charges have been increasing throughout the years (see the first graph/table).

As measured by the total number of charges filed (for each protected characteristic).

In other words, none of the protected characteristics have been charged less.

Fact #2: Since 2000, the proportions have remained steady for each protected characteristic (see the second graph/table).

The ‘proportions’ are measured as a percent of total complaints filed.

For example, age discrimination has stayed in the 18%-24% range.

Takeaway #1: Overall, discrimination has increased throughout the years (as reflected by more and more charges being filed).

Takeaway #2: Throughout the years, the rankings for the different forms of discrimination (eg, age, color, etc.) have remained the same (as seen by the somewhat flattened percentages).

Note #1: In 2000, the graph shows a large spike in discrimination charges. TBD contends that this is not a function of increased discrimination (at that timepoint). Rather, it is a reflection of increased data (borne out of technological advances in public recordkeeping).

Additional: Diving deeper into this dataset reveals more information.

For instance, you can correlate total complaints with [each] discrimination basis (eg, age vs total, color vs total, etc.). Doing this reveals that total complaints are most heavily tied to racial discrimination (ie, racial discrimination impacts the total number of complaints filed with the FCHR – more so than any other basis).

Similarly, you can correlate discrimination bases with each other (eg, age & col, dis & fam, etc.). Doing this reveals that retaliation is the most heavily correlated charge. In other words, when people file complaints with multiple bases (eg, age+sex, age+dis+sex, etc.) retaliation is the most commonly added/included basis.

So, it might be worthwhile to look at how discrimination charges vary when retaliation is involved:

retaliation incidence;

...POINTS & THINGS...

Congratulations! You're now booked up on how FCHR Charges have been distributed throughout the year!

Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.

Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.

As always, please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
Pages That You
Might Also Like
Summary Raw Data
How-To: Appeal a Final Order How-To: Write Exceptions to a Final Order
Info: FCHR Bribery Info: FCHR Discrimination Info: Suing for Constitutional Deprivations
Guide: File Suit (Federal) Guide: File Suit (State)
Handbook: File Suit (EEOC) Handbook: PFR (FCHR/DOAH)
Flow Chart: FCHR Investigation
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike IconLike
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG