HomeAboutContact | ...loading...
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help Others

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

TBD Marketplace™
iconWebsite
Buy™Sell™Shop™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Sell™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell! Help thousands of other litigants who [will] find themselves in your shoes!
Sell™ Now
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Buy™

buy real-live sample court documents/templates

– for free! (ie, with Book Points™)

Sell™

sell your court documents/templates

(earn 1,000 Book Points™ per file)

Shop™ Now

enter the TBD Marketplace™

to help your fellow man/woman

get the justice that he/she deserves!

§40 | DILATORY, ABSURD, OR FRIVOLOUS MOTIONS

For the convenience of deliberative assemblies, it is necessary to allow some highly privileged motions to be renewed again and again after progress in debate or the transaction of any business, and to allow a single member, by calling for a division, to have another vote taken. If there was no provision for protecting the assembly, a minority of two members could be constantly raising questions of order and appealing from every decision of the chair, and calling for a division on every vote, even when it was nearly unanimous, and moving to lay motions on the table, and to adjourn, and offering amendments that are simply frivolous or absurd. By taking advantage of parliamentary forms and methods a small minority could practically stop the business of a deliberative assembly having short sessions, if there was no provision for such contingency. Congress met it by adopting this rule:
"No dilatory motion shall be entertained by the speaker."
But, without adopting any rule on the subject, every deliberative assembly has the inherent right to protect itself from being imposed upon by members using parliamentary forms to prevent it from doing the very thing for which it is in session, and which these forms were designed to assist, namely, to transact business. Therefore, whenever the chair is satisfied that members are using parliamentary forms merely to obstruct business, he should either not recognize them, or else rule them out of order. After the chair has been sustained upon an appeal, he should not entertain another appeal from the same obstructionists while they are engaged evidently in trying by that means to obstruct business. While the chair should always be courteous and fair, he should be firm in protecting the assembly from imposition, even though it be done in strict conformity with all parliamentary rules except this one, that no dilatory, absurd, or frivolous motions are allowed.

As an illustration of a frivolous or absurd motion, suppose Mr. A is to be in the city next week and a motion has been made to invite him to address the assembly at its next meeting, the meetings being weekly. Now, if a motion is made to refer the question to a committee with instructions to report at the next regular meeting, the chair should rule it out of order as frivolous or absurd.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on Item 40 from the Robert Rules of Order!

Please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
logoAdobe Download
logoSurvey Survey
logoHTML FCHR Governance Policy
logoHTML FCHR Performance Evaluation
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One Article 6: Some Main and Unclassified Motions
Florida Code of Judicial Conduct
Art. II Pol. 4 (FCHR Governance Policy)
Florida Bar
Local Rules of Court
Civil Rights Attorneys - FL
Pertinent Federal Laws Pertinent Florida Laws
Fed. R. App. P. Fed. R. Civ. P. Fed. R. Crim. P. Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin.
Chapter 28-102 FAC Regulations
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG