TBD | Item 6.2.01 (CA04 Pro Se Handbook)

ITEM 6.2.01 | GROUNDS FOR REHEARING

Although petitions for rehearing are filed in a great many cases, few are granted. Filing a petition solely for purposes of delay or in order merely to reargue the case is an abuse of the privilege. A petition for rehearing must contain an introduction stating that, in counsel's judgment, one or more of the following situations exist:

1. a material factual or legal matter was overlooked in the decision;

2. a change in the law occurred after the case was submitted and was overlooked by the panel;

3. the opinion is in conflict with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, this court, or another court of appeals and the conflict is not addressed in the opinion; or

4. the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance.

The petition must state with particularity the points of law or fact that the petitioner believes the court has overlooked or misapprehended and must argue in support of the petition. Fed. R. App. P. 40; Loc. R. 40(a) & (b).

Congratulations! You're now booked up on Item 6.2.01 from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals' Pro Se Handbook!

You might need to reference it during your pursuit of justice.

For instance, you might need to examine one of these codes of conduct in order to protect yourself from judges/lawyers/organizations who break the law (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).

Nevertheless – and as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,

www.TextBookDiscrimination.com

ITEM 6.2.01 | GROUNDS FOR REHEARING

Pages That You
Might Also Like

add a comment

thank you, come again!
TBD 1.037

Submit a Quiz Question

That Will Test Another User's Page-Specific Knowledge

	Download
	Briefs
	Petitions

ITEM 6.2.01 | GROUNDS FOR REHEARING

Pages That YouMight Also Like

add a comment

thank you, come again!TBD 1.037

Submit a Quiz Question

That Will Test Another User's Page-Specific Knowledge

Pages That You
Might Also Like

thank you, come again!
TBD 1.037